House, M.D.: Season 2

What can be said about a series that must certainly be ranked as one of the most compelling to have ever appeared on television? It is easy to view the slew of awards that "House, M.D." has been nominated for (and won), to recall the litany of accolades the show has garnered from news, entertainment, and magazine critics, and even to review the endless series of online postings concerning the show (like this very one, here, on Amazon), and conclude that, "Yes, "House, M.D." is probably a good show." But in fact, "House, M.D." is more than a good show. For many viewers, the series is easily one of the most fascinating and unusual to have ever been aired on television. Moreover, and dare I say it, the series will likely eventually be ranked amongst the top television shows ever produced on network television. But before I say any more about "House, M.D.," let me briefly for the reader summarize the show. "House, M.D." is a medical drama that takes place at a fictional teaching hospital ("Princeton-Plainsborough Hospital"). The story revolves around a particular doctor, Dr. Gregory House, an individual who has established himself as a medical genius able to solve difficult medical mysteries that other doctors have been unable to solve. Dr. House works with a small group of internists who are serving in residence under him, and who, despite their much less experience, actively work with House to solve medical problems through a technique called a "Differential Diagnosis," a kind of group-based brainstorming session where diagnostic ideas are presented, written on a white board, and systematically eliminated by comparing each hypothesis with the ongoing list of patient symptoms. But Dr. House is more than just a diagnostic genius: he possesses a debilitating leg injury that keeps him in perpetual pain, and he regularly uses powerful prescription painkillers to the point where there is genuine concern that he may, in fact, be a pain medicine addict. But there's more. Along with his genius, House has an incredibly insensitive and offensive demeanor, and seemingly has no concern for social norms, courtesies, or sometimes, even common decency. His unparalleled genius at helping patients is probably what keeps him employed in spite of his incredibly ongoing offensive behavior. What makes this show so compelling, so unique, and so interesting? There is probably no one answer to this question. At the core of it is likely House himself, a character who is fundamentally a contradiction, a walking incongruity, a person that we desperately and increasingly wish to understand, and perhaps, even wish to control to correct his unacceptable behavior. We find ourselves watching this man and so strongly wishing that we can figure him out, to come to a true understanding and belief about him, to solve the mystery of who he really is, and by that knowledge, settle the manifold open questions surrounding him and his relationships to others that each episode more fully presents. Unfortunately, or should I rather say, "fortunately," such an understanding is not easily developed. The complexities, ambiguities, and open questions surrounding the character of House come tantalizingly close to being solved time after time, only to be later shown that what we thought was the answer to this man was really just another false lead, another misunderstanding, another fact to add into this increasingly difficult puzzle. Part of the show's allure is this ongoing dissonance, not only between House and his coworkers, but deeply within House himself. Is he truly an uncaring person? Is he truly a person who views his entire medical career as simply a series of puzzles to be solved, and where people who recover are simply a side effect of the solved puzzle? Does he really look at every social, religious, or ethnic factor as a legitimate target of derision? Is he truly hostile to people's religious convictions? Does he truly believe that his drug addiction is an irrelevant issue to his work? Each episode faces us with House's reaction to these questions to varying degrees, and over time, we may find that we build an increasing understanding of this man, but we often find those understandings torn apart in a later episode, where new observations on House make us rethink what we think we knew. In spite of House's problems and deficiencies, we often find him an imminently likeable character, and we often see hints of goodness in him that he desperately tries to keep hidden from others. Often, it is hinted in the subtilest of ways that House himself wishes to hide from others the fact that he truly does care, but this hint is just as quickly dashed as we witness his next immature toy kicking. (It can sometimes seem that House is more of a four year old in a nursery who is testing his fellow nursery members for territorial markers. In other cases, he is the genius child who seeks to use others as fodder for his most recent theories on human and animal behavior.) "House, M.D.," if the truth be known, does not start out in Season One as a soap opera, but by Season Five for the series run, I think a defensible case can be made that the show takes on many of the trappings of a soap opera, curiously and ironically enough, mirroring the very soap operas that the character House in the show is seen so frequently watching (often, on an old, 1990's style portable television located in his office). This morphing into the arena of the soap opera doesn't really matter, though, for the viewer who has gone through the entire set of previous episodes in order. With no attempt to defend this shift in style, the show uses its first three seasons to genuinely establish itself as a puzzle solving, medical mystery show, with House serving as a medical Sherlock Holmes (sans the hat and the pipe, but plus the strange personality and temperament issues), and the stories are easily carried with each individual episode standing as a mental gymnastic exercise that keeps the viewer wanting more. But strewn through these episodes are myriads of strange, and often, very awkward character interactions that are left unfinished and unexplored, tantalizing us with seeming keys to unlock the mystery of House. It is perhaps inevitable that a show lasting so many years (now in its sixth season) and having such strong characters and unusual trappings would be inevitably drawn to revisit and examine such unfinished business. These "explorations" begin to occur more repeatedly in Season Four, and by Season Five, we see the exaggeration of much of this at the expense of series' original, focal point of medical mysteries to be resolved, which by this point in the series often take back seat to the ever growing personal dramas. But even this doesn't matter. The issues and themes explored in Season Five, while taking on the feeling of a soap opera, are still handled with great expertise and generally fascinating ways, so that we still find ourselves focused on each event, all the time still (unconsciously at times, I must admit) wishing that we can figure House out, get the mystery of House solved, and have some type of a resolution that fits our conception of the real world. By the end of Season Five, we still do not have an answer for this dilemma, and the show uses this dilemma to hold the audience's attention in a powerful manner. The basic premise of the show is so startling unique and fascinating in its own right that the show does not need to rely on cheap "shock" tricks to maintain attention. It is true that there are a number of "shocking" events to occur through the series, and there can be no doubt that the show, being first and foremost a network based television format production, employs "cliffhangers" to hold the viewer through the regular commercial breaks, but it is amazing to see how the show is regularly worked into individual episodes that are artfully crafted into stories that flow, and work, from beginning to end. Quite some time ago, I wrote a long review for "The Rockford Files," a television show in the 1970's that, in my own thinking, achieved the status as being one of the best television shows ever produced. I had written my review at a time when the first "Rockford Files" DVD's were being released, and the opportunity to re-watch these shows reminded me again of the superior writing, the acting, and the impressive interworking of the cast which made this show, not just a cut above the average television show, but a true classic, one that could almost not be challenged in the realm of television. I still feel that way about The Rockford Files, and, truth be known, another very different show from a decade earlier, "The Dick Van Dyke Show," had many of these same characteristics, all coalescing to make what eventual became in both cases a classic production. "The Rockford Files" and "The Dick Van Dyke Show" reached such pinnacles of performance that they remain examples of the very best television ever made, and even the ravages of 30 and 40 years of time have done little but solidify that achievement. "House, M.D." is, in my opinion, is likely destined for that same level of accolade. In the show, we find that same coalescing of features - a truly unique character creation, excellent writing, and a cast that works well together - that will argue for the show's inclusion in that highest level of ranking. But whether that specific claim turns out to be true or not, the fact remains that House, M.D. is one of the most fascinating, intriguing, and enjoyable shows to watch. We witness medical problems and the difficult procedure in diagnosing and treating those problems; we witness the struggles, oddities, and offensiveness (and yes, there are many parts of the show that are incredibly offensive) of a main character who remains both a genius and an enigma, an inscrutable person who is endlessly fascinating to behold; we witness a cast of actors who must earn to interact with the powerful character of House while establishing their own credibility; and finally, but not least of all, we enjoy Hugh Laurie's incredible rendition of the House character. Add these factors up, and you end up with one heck of a fascinating show. I'll say it in conclusion again, that this is one of the best television shows to have appeared in years, and Hugh Laurie is superb in his role as House. You can enjoy it even more on DVD, where there are no commercial interruptions. I rate this as five stars, but the real truth is that it is one BIG star (House) with four other stars with him. Well, make that seven or eight other stars, depending on the season you are currently watching.

"House" is a perfect television show, and is, in my opinion, the only dramatic show currently in production that's worth watching. The show, centered on the acerbic, thoroughly disagreeable, and utterly brilliant Dr. Gregory House, is well written, intelligently directed, and perfectly acted. Hugh Laurie as House deservedly gets the lion's share of the plaudits for the show, but the remaining cast is equally brilliant in their vital supporting roles. Omar Epps, Jennifer Morrison, and Jesse Spencer deserve special mention for playing the young and impressionable doctors putting up with House's eccentricities, but my favorite of the supporting cast is Robert Sean Leonard as oncologist Dr. James Wilson. Leonard's portrayal is both funny and poignant, as are the lines crafted for him by the excellent screenwriters. There are several plotlines in this season, most significantly the reappearance of ex-girlfriend Stacy, played by Sela Ward, in House's life. If I had only one thing to change about season two, it would be to take a bit less time for the Stacy subplot, which, for me, was stretched beyond its usefulness. There are many excellent episodes, and many interesting guest stars including LL Cool J, Ron Livingston, Cynthia Nixon, and Michelle Trachtenberg. The DVD set includes many extras including a "House" documentary, a blooper reel, and producer commentaries: I found them all enjoyable. Prime time television simply does not get any better than this: I highly recommend this season of "House," but urge you to do the sensible thing and buy all the seasons at once. Yes, they're that good.

Very cutting-edge drama with an outstanding cast. Not your typical medical drama. House is one of those series where you have a love-hate relationship with the main character... a lot like Archie Bunker, where you might think the things House says, but you would never treat people the way he does -- but you might want to! And you end up caring about each character... especially surprising when you feel that you are just getting to hate one! The plots are fantastically complex medical diagnosis with enough intrigue to leave you baffled at how many times a doctor can get something wrong; but still end up saving the person's life in a fashion of miraculous discovery... and Hugh Laurie is exquisite when he "gets it"! Amazing tension in the show is created because you know that House will eventually get it right -- saving the patient when no one else can, but he makes many wrong turns along the way... a lot like his life. This series will leave you hanging on the edge of your seat and praising the makers of VHS & DVD that you don't have to wait thru the commercial!! I stopped watching it during the regular season because the commercials were causing too much anxiety! Sit back with some popcorn and enjoy... I'll bet you can't watch just one episode!

After having seen Hugh Laurie in shows such as Black Adder (in which is absolutely hysterical) and movies (Sense and Sensibility and Peter's Friends), anything he is in had to be terrific. So when the trailers for the first season started playing and Hugh Laurie was going to star in it, I knew I had to watch it. I wasn't disappointed and couldn't wait for Season 2 to start this past January. I am glad they will be starting Season 3 on September 5th rather than mid season. Season 2 picked up the story line following the relationship between House and the return of Stacy that was the bombshell of Season 1. I was glad there was resolution of sorts, and was also glad it happened early in the season. House has to be House without distractions; it is what makes us love him. There is a reason why House scored consistantly in the Nielsen top 10 this past season; it is because it is a terrific show that doesn't have to constantly show gore to get the point across. All the characters are intertwined and the dynamics of their relationships and how they relate to each other and their patients is what carries the show's points across. Anyone who likes a show that is fast paced and intellectually sound should watch this show and own it on DVD so it can be enjoyed over and over.

House rides again in the second series of this wonderful hospital procedural. Slightly less Sherlockian than the first series although all the elements of Holmes' ferocious intellect are there (as is the number of House's apartment -- 221b!). The intense characterisation of the central flawed personality continues. There has been nothing this exposed on TV since the original British "Cracker". The writers go deep into the dark side of their character and Hugh Laurie responds brilliantly. They daringly allow their star to become almost repulsively rude and obnoxious at times while we see his pain and frustration played out against his intellectual rigour. The crackling tension between the characters is perfectly framed by the sharp dialogue, crisp and dramatic plotting of each medical mystery, and flashes of sometimes hilarious dark humour -- usually in the clinic setting. Writing doesn't get better than this. The overall effect is a feast of theatre which you will want to watch over and over. As with so many of the best American TV series the script is the star. But the material brings out the very best of a great squad of actors. Bring on series 3!

I have both seasons one and two sets now and I love them. Not since MASH have I looked forward to a series on TV and in the last few years have almost completely stopped watching TV altogether. This is the one show I plan for and watch. The only reason I didn't give the set a rating of 5 is that I would have like to have seen more bonus features...more interviews, bloopers, anything to have more to enjoy. I think compared to other DVDs, especially box sets, this one is real skimpy on the bonuses. I know I will buy season three even if they don't come up with more goodies in the set, but I will be disappointed if they don't add more.

Mea culpa. I'll admit it. I happened upon House mid-second season. Little did I know within a year I'd be hooked, desperate for my weekly fix of the wickedly attractive yet insanely abrupt! Who needs mind-altering drugs when the creative symbiosis of David Shore/Bryan Singer/Katie Jacobs and the rest of their mojo-magic crew sets lovably perverse genius Hugh Laurie loose opposite affably earnest Robert Sean Leonard to do what only they can do? Um, taut innuendos, anyone? Unlike some TV actors who can't even eat a sandwich sans cue cards, the talented duo's bickering camaraderie scarfs up the subtext of both female and male dreams. House/Wilson is Greek theater being played out by the American Medical Association's Monty Python Repertory company atop a world stage while perched precariously upon a high wire. With no net, yet. Bravo. Even though Fox reruns their reruns and USA, too, it's looking like a long, hot, steamy summer until The Boys & Co. are back in town. Wheww[...] Until then, I am happy to write The House Blogs! AND House-sit Seasons 1 and 2, for there is a there that is destination worthy until the arrival of the medical narrative's Season 3 on DVD, due out in late August. For in a spectacle to savor when last we saw the low GQ-high IQ Dr. Gregory House, he was running his long lithe fingertips oh-so-gently about the sleek glossy curves of his new musically acoustic lover, virtually about to pluck her into ecstasy, and therein lies my other "problem" with this unquestionably brilliant show: Gulp. I like this man far, far too much. Flip this House? No way!

Fast and accurate service; absolutely no complaints. This DVD set completed our House, MD, collection.

Well I bought all the house season from 1 to 4 and I completely love this series...but when at the beginning of each DVD there is a 2 minute long film of how not to download and copy DVDs it is very annoying to find out that when you actually buy the stuff it doesn't work!!!! A very good friend of mine was at my place once and we were watching it together and he loved it too so I thought it would be proper to get him season 2 as a Christmas present! And guess what??!!!! 2 episodes from the DVDs didn't play at all! The producers of the DVDs, and Amazon selling it should not complain if later an unsatisfied and frustrated customer stops buying original DVDs and starts downloading them! All in all it is a great series! Highly recommended!

House season 2 arrived on time and in great condition. All 6 disks look great. Love this series and wanted to watch it again. Have season 1 so now I can see season 2. He is addictive.

Très bonne série

Der Ablauf jeder Episode folgt stets demselben Schema: ein Patient jedweder Bevölkerungsschicht bricht unter meist erschreckenden, äußerlichen Krankenmerkmalen zusammen. Das Team um Chefdiagnostiker Dr. House ermittelt - in der Regel unter Zeitdruck - per Differenzialdiagnose (d.h. die Summe aller Diagnosen, die als Erklärung eines Symptoms oder der Kombination mehrerer Symptome möglich sind) die passende Therapie, die sich nicht selten als falsch herausstellt. In letzter Minute findet Dr. House fast immer die rettende Lösung - in Season 2 enden jedoch verhältnismäßig viele Folgen, der Realität nahe, ohne Happy End oder gar letal. Nicht wenige Skeptiker und (TV-)Ärztehasser haben vermutlich bei Erscheinen der ersten Staffel DR. HOUSE genervt die Augen verdreht. Denn wieviel Weißkittel und karbolgeschwängerte Atmosphäre verträgt die Fernsehlandschaft noch? Mit dem von David Shore erschaffenen Charakter gelang schließlich das allzu seltene Kunststück, Kritiker wie Publikum gleichermaßen von der einzigartigen, intellektuell herausfordernden Qualität dieser neuen TV-Show zu überzeugen. Der große Verdienst - neben den selbstverständlich ebenso wichtigen, in dem Fall hochklassigen Drehbuchautoren - gebührt allen voran dem Briten Hugh Laurie (PETER'S FRIENDS, SINN UND SINNLICHKEIT), der die Gratwanderung zwischen sarkastischem Ekelpaket und im Grunde genommen heimlichen, einsamen Philanthrophen bravourös meistert. Für alle Einsteiger seien die wesentlichen Merkmale des kauzigen Mediziners kurz wiederholt: brillanter Diagnostiker, der seine sehr fähigen Mitarbeiter ausnahmslos barsch behandelt und dessen permanent schlechte Laune von chronischen Schmerzen im rechten Bein (nach operativer Entfernung eines Muskels) herrührt. Nicht zuletzt diesen Umstand nimmt House gerne zum Vorwand für seinen ab und an auch grundlosen Tablettenkonsum. Betrachtet man die just auf DVD veröffentlichte zweite Season, die von der ersten Folge an (mit Gaststar L.L. Cool J.) Suchtpotenzial entwickelt, so kann man die erste guten Gewissens als Warm-up bezeichnen. Trotz dem oben geschilderten, immer gleichen Handlungsverlauf stellen sich weder Wiederholungen noch Ermüdungserscheinungen ein. Zwar könnten sich die Macher den Vorwurf gefallen lassen, dass die obskuren Krankheitsbilder, die von den Top-Ärzten meist mühevoll zu diagnostizieren sind, ziemlich konstruiert sind. Doch 1. müssten in ähnlicher Form alle storytechnisch kompliziert hergeleiteten Forensiker-Serien vom Schlage C.S.I. kritisiert werden und 2. übersieht man derartige kleinlichen Mängel als medizinischer Laie bereitwillig. Und erliegt vielmehr der schaurig-schönen Faszination für all die absonderlichen Fehlfunktionen, zu denen der menschliche Chemiebaukasten, genannt Körper, fähig ist. Bemerkenswert ist vor allem die Fülle an pointierten, scharfzüngigen Dialogen, mit denen die Halbgötter in Weiß und ihr schwarzes Schaf mit der Kodderschnauze die anfangs ausweglos erscheinenden Krankheitsfälle lösen. Es würde den Rahmen sprengen, auf einzelne Episoden einzugehen, da selten genug jede Folge von gleichbleibender Qualität und höchstem Unterhaltungswert ist. Im Gegensatz zur Season 1 kommen - wahrscheinlich als Zugeständnis an die C.S.I.-verwöhnte Zuschauerschaft - mehr perfekt animierte Einsichten in die innersten Körperregionen zum Einsatz, unbedingt notwendig sind sie indes nicht. Außerdem sind erste Anzeichen von Experimentierfreude wahrzunehmen, die beispielsweise in Episode 8 "Fehlverhalten" zum Aufbrechen der definierten Erzählstruktur führt. In diesem Highlight der 2. Staffel wird in Form einer Befragung, die zur Untersuchung der Falschbehandlung mit tödlichem Ausgang für eine Patientin Dr. Chases durchgeführt wird, die Story in Rückblenden und aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln höchst spannend erzählt. Ähnliches gilt aber ebenso für alle übrigen Geschichten - von Dr. House' Motorradkauf, dem unerwarteten Besuch seiner Eltern, den Wiederbelebungsversuchen seiner Beziehung zur Krankenhausjuristin Stacy Warner oder den dramatischen Unfall Dr. Camerons, die von einem HIV-Patienten blutig angehustet wird. All denjenigen, die ihre Sinne von den Effektgewittern der großen Leinwand erholen wollen, sei diese unkonventionelle, politisch natürlich völlig unkorrekte US-Serie mit britischem (Humor-)Einschlag ans Herz gelegt. Besser geschriebene und gespielte Serienkost in Kinoqualität bekommt man derzeit kaum zu Gesicht.

Ultra fan de House, je ne m en lasse pas…..si vous ne travaillez pas dans le médical, je suis pas certain que vous adoriez, mais si vous regardez la série en intégralité, l évolution des personnages et de l intrigue peuvent vous accrochez…..